Human Rights Atlas · Incredible Attorneys

85 decisions. A decision engaging a claim is not a finding that the right was violated — the outcome is in each opinion.

In the Interest of J.A v. and J.B v. v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2026-07-08 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
In re J.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-07-06 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
Bruce Henry v. Sheriff of Tuscaloosa County, Alabama
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-07-06 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
Matter of Calogero JJ. (Donovan L.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026-07-02 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
IN RE BEAUM.,ET AL.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026-07-01 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
Dcpp v. J.L. and C.H., in the Matter of the Guardianship of L.G.L.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2026-06-30 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
In re R.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-06-29 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
In the Interest of S.H., A.H., and A.H., Children v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2026-06-26 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
In Re Child of Mindy P.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026-06-25 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection
In the Interest of P.H.S. and E.K.S., Children v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2026-06-24 · U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Child protection

← Newer