- Incident
- In re R.M.
- Location
- Ohio Court of Appeals · US
- Date of the incident
- not in the record
- Decided
- 2026-06-29
- Authority
- Ohio Court of Appeals
- Law involved
- U.S. Const. amend. XIV
- Court case
- No. 9-26-01; 9-26-02; 9-26-03; 9-26-04 · 2026 Ohio 2472
- Outcome
- Not extracted — read the opinion.
- Remedy
- —
- Status
- Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
[Cite as In re R.M., 2026-Ohio-2472.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY IN RE: CASE NO. 9-26-01 C.M., ADJUDICATED DEPENDENT CHILD. OPINION AND [CHRISTOPHER M. - APPELLANT] JUDGMENT ENTRY [RAYCHEL M. - APPELLANT] IN RE: CASE NO. 9-26-02
Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)
A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.