Absence of authority is reported as ignorance
No law found for a jurisdiction means we hold no registered source for it — never that nothing applies.
Trust centre
Every organisation declares where its authoritative records live. These are the current counts across the platform.
5
organisations with a residency profile
5
on the shared platform database
0
on a dedicated isolated database
0
on their own infrastructure
5 of 18 integrations are configured on this deployment. An integration that is not configured refuses rather than guessing — it never produces a result from somewhere else and presents it as the answer.
Features that depend on these will report that they are unavailable.
No law found for a jurisdiction means we hold no registered source for it — never that nothing applies.
A document you may not read is never placed in a model's context, however semantically relevant it is.
What the law is and what the law was are different questions. Both are answerable, and amendments never overwrite history.
Hash-chained per organisation and enforced by the database, so a deleted or edited entry breaks the chain and is found.
16 sources are cleared to store full text. Until a source is cleared it is stored as a citation, a date and a link — the text is withheld, and the record says why. Every page that shows somebody else's text names its publisher and its licence.
10 of those approvals do not rest on legal advice. They were cleared to get real data into a build that is being tested, on licences that permit commercial reuse on their face. A lawyer has not reviewed our compliance with their attribution conditions. Each carries an expiry:
CURIA owner testing
CourtListener owner testing
EUR-Lex owner testing
Federal Register of Legislation owner testing
Irish Statute Book owner testing
Justice Laws Website owner testing
LEGI — Légifrance bulk datasets owner testing
Laws.Africa / AfricanLII owner testing
New Zealand Legislation owner testing
legislation.gov.uk owner testing