New Ingestion is live for the UK, the EU, US federal law and ~7M US decisions. Search the corpus ›

Cases Directory

Reported judgments, filterable by court, jurisdiction, area of law, outcome and year. 57 decisions from 24 courts — and where a court is missing, that is a gap in what we have licensed, not a court that decides nothing.

6 decisions matching these filters

Bain v. Speedwell

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1 May 1784 · 2 U.S. 40

Outcome not recorded

May Session, 1784. Bain, et. al. Appellants, versus, Schooner Speedwell, et. al. Appellees. THIS was an appeal from the Admiralty of the State of Rhode Island, where the Schooner h…

Keane v. The Brig Gloucester

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1 January 1782 · 2 U.S. 36

Outcome not recorded

Keane, et. al. Libellants and Appellants, versus The Brig Gloucester, et al. Appellees. THIS was an appeal from the Admiralty of Pennsylvania, and after argument, PACA and GRIFFIN,…

Darby v. The Brig Erstern

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1 January 1782 · 2 U.S. 34

Outcome not recorded

January Sessions, 1782. Darby, et. al. Appellants, versus The Brig Erstern, et al. THIS was an appeal from the Admiralty of the State of Massachusetts-bay, where the Brig and her c…

Miller v. The Ship Resolution

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1 December 1781 · 2 U.S. 19

Outcome not recorded

December Session, 1781. Miller, Libellant and Appellant, versus The Ship Resolution, &c. The Same, versus The Cargo of the Ship Resolution, &c. On motion of Wilson, for the Appella…

Miller v. The Ship Resolution

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1 August 1781 · 2 U.S. 1

Outcome not recorded

August Session 1781. Miller et. al. Libellants and Appellants, versus The Ship Resolution, and Ingersoll, Claimant and Appellee. Miller et. al. Libellants and Appellants, versus Th…

Text reproduced from

  • Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab. U.S. judicial opinions are not copyrightable (government edicts doctrine). Open — US judicial opinions are not copyrightable (government edicts doctrine)