New Ingestion is live for the UK, the EU, US federal law and ~7M US decisions. Search the corpus ›

Bain v. Speedwell

2 U.S. 40

How do we know? Taken from the published judgment; not rewritten by the platform.

This is a decision of United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, given 1 May 1784, from Caselaw Access Project. No later decision here cites it — that does not show it is still good law.

No later authority in this platform cites this decision. That means the platform holds no subsequent treatment — not that the decision is undisturbed.

Source

Published by
Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab
Source
Caselaw Access Project
Licence
Open — US judicial opinions are not copyrightable (government edicts doctrine)
Held here since
26 September 2026

Version

Decided
1 May 1784
Later treatment
Not cited by any later authority here
Jurisdiction
United States — Federal

Authority

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Citation
2 U.S. 40
Unknown treatment 0 citing authorities

No later authority in this platform cites this decision. That means the platform holds no subsequent treatment — not that the decision is undisturbed.

The decision

Read aloud by your browser
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided
1784-05-01

Headnote

May Session, 1784. Bain, et. al. Appellants, versus, Schooner Speedwell, et. al. Appellees. THIS was an appeal from the Admiralty of the State of Rhode Island, where the Schooner had been condemned as prize; and the record was submitted to the decision of the Court, without argument. On the 24th of May, 1784, GRIFFIN, READ, and LOWELL, the presiding Commissioners, delivered the following judgment:

Judgment

Read from a scan

OCR confidence 0.695 is below 0.7. This text was read from a scan and contains transcription errors. It may be relied on for what the case decided, but must not be presented as a verbatim quotation.

¶ 1[majority — BY THE COURT.]

¶ 2BY THE COURT. It appearing, by the inspection of the record, that the Schooner in question, was captured from the British, since the operation of the preliminary articles of peace, (to wit, on the day of ) the condemnation cannot be sustained. Decree reversed.

AI summary

Choose who the summary is for. Every statement links to the paragraph it comes from — the summary is never the only way to read this.

Ask LawTAG

Sign in to ask your team's LawTAGs about this page.

What it relied on

No outbound citations have been extracted for this decision.

In the news

News coverage of “Bain v. Speedwell” in the last three months, from GDELT.