New Ingestion is live for the UK, the EU, US federal law and ~7M US decisions. Search the corpus ›

Zyst v. Miller

Prison conditions

Incident
Zyst v. Miller
Location
Court of Appeals of Oregon · US
Date of the incident
not in the record
Decided
2026-02-04
Authority
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Law involved
U.S. Const. amend. VIII
Court case
No. A183152 · 346 Or. App. 801
Outcome
Not extracted — read the opinion.
Remedy
—
Status
Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
No. 62 February 4, 2026 801 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON TARA ELLYSSIA ZYST, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jamie MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. Malheur County Circuit Court 19CV19556; A183152 Jenefer Stenzel Grant, Senior Judge. Argued and submitted July 23, 2025. Kyleigh Gray argued the ca

Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)

A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.