- Incident
- Terenzio v. Urena
- Location
- Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · US
- Date of the incident
- not in the record
- Decided
- 2025-12-18
- Authority
- Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
- Law involved
- U.S. Const. amend. VIII
- Court case
- No. 24-1244
- Outcome
- Not extracted — read the opinion.
- Remedy
- —
- Status
- Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1244 DELMA TERENZIO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph A. Terenzio; THOMAS SULLIVAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John J. Sullivan; EDWARD POULIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maurice C. Poulin, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. FRANCISCO URENA; MARYLOU SUDDERS; CHERYL LUSSIER POPPE;
Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)
A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.