- Incident
- Cardenas-Ornelas v. Johnson
- Location
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · US
- Date of the incident
- not in the record
- Decided
- 2026-01-29
- Authority
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Law involved
- U.S. Const. amend. VIII
- Court case
- No. 24-6755
- Outcome
- Not extracted — read the opinion.
- Remedy
- —
- Status
- Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LUIS CARDENAS-ORNELAS, No. 24-6755 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cv-00030- ART-MDC v. CALVIN JOHNSON; HAROLD WICKHAM; CHARLES DANIELS; OPINION GARY PICCININI; TIMOTHY STRUCK; ROBERT OWENS; JESSIE BRIGHTWELL; MANUEL PORTIL
Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)
A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.