New Ingestion is live for the UK, the EU, US federal law and ~7M US decisions. Search the corpus ›

U.T. v. Barr

Refugee and asylum

Incident
U.T. v. Barr
Location
District Court, District of Columbia · US
Date of the incident
not in the record
Decided
2026-09-21
Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Law involved
8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3); CAT art. 3
Court case
No. Civil Action No. 2020-0116
Outcome
Not extracted — read the opinion.
Remedy
—
Status
Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.T., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-116 (EGS) TODD BLANCHE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, a group of noncitizens seeking asylum in the United States and organizations who provide immigration counseling and legal services to asylum

Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)

A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.