- Incident
- Cherry v. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
- Location
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · US
- Date of the incident
- not in the record
- Decided
- 2026-08-21
- Authority
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Law involved
- U.S. Const. amend. I
- Court case
- No. 25-4763
- Outcome
- Not extracted — read the opinion.
- Remedy
- —
- Status
- Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PAUL CHERRY; LINDA LOPEZ; No. 25-4763 STEPHEN J. ANDERSON; D.C. No. CHARLES FRADY; TRENTON 3:23-cv-05077- DEBOER, DGE Plaintiffs - Appellants, OPINION RUTHANNA SHIRLEY, JOHNATHAN HONE, MARCUS SANCHEZ, MORGAN WINES, SAMUEL KOLB, THOM
Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)
A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.