- Incident
- Medrano v. Acosta
- Location
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · US
- Date of the incident
- not in the record
- Decided
- 2026-09-25
- Authority
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Law involved
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983; U.S. Const. amend. IV
- Court case
- No. 24-6346
- Outcome
- Not extracted — read the opinion.
- Remedy
- —
- Status
- Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEX ROMERO MEDRANO, No. 24-6346 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cv-10108- MEMF-SP v. Officer ACOSTA; Officer ROBERTS, OPINION Defendants - Appellants, CITY OF BELL GARDENS, BELL GARDENS POLICE, MONTEREY PA
Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)
A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.