New Ingestion is live for the UK, the EU, US federal law and ~7M US decisions. Search the corpus ›

C.D.M. v. Lee County Department of Child Protection Services, by Andrea A. Sanders, S.A.M., S.C.M., S.M. and D.M., Minors and Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services

Child protection

Incident
C.D.M. v. Lee County Department of Child Protection Services, by Andrea A. Sanders, S.A.M., S.C.M., S.M. and D.M., Minors and Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services
Location
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · US
Date of the incident
not in the record
Decided
2026-07-28
Authority
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Law involved
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
Court case
No. 2024-CP-01427-COA
Outcome
Not extracted — read the opinion.
Remedy
—
Status
Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CP-01427-COA C.D.M. APPELLANT v. LEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD APPELLEES PROTECTION SERVICES, BY ANDREA A. SANDERS, S.A.M., S.C.M., S.M. AND D.M., MINORS AND MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/25/2024 TRIAL JUDGE

Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)

A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.