- Incident
- Macdonald v. Oregon Health and Science University
- Location
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · US
- Date of the incident
- not in the record
- Decided
- 2026-10-02
- Authority
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Law involved
- U.S. Const. amend. XIV; U.S. Const. amend. I
- Court case
- No. 24-4852
- Outcome
- Not extracted — read the opinion.
- Remedy
- —
- Status
- Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRITTANY K. MACDONALD, No. 24-4852 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cv-01942-IM v. OREGON HEALTH AND OPINION SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, A Public Corporation and Governmental Entity; WAYNE MONFRIES, An Individual; RUTH BEYER, An Individual; MAHTAB BRAR, An Indi
Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)
A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.