- Incident
- Sotero Rivera-Mendoza v. Todd Blanche
- Location
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · US
- Date of the incident
- not in the record
- Decided
- 2026-06-25
- Authority
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Law involved
- 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3); CAT art. 3
- Court case
- No. 21-70107
- Outcome
- Not extracted — read the opinion.
- Remedy
- —
- Status
- Decision to review — the outcome is in the opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARTIN LEON-BRIVIESCA, No. 17-73108 Petitioner, Agency No. A038-754-220 v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. No. 21-70107 SOTERO RIVERA-MENDOZA, Agency No. Petitioner,
Source: CourtListener (Free Law Project)
A decision engaging a human-rights claim is not, by itself, a finding that a right was violated.